In 2021 vape is still controversial
At the beginning of the vape, there was controversy. However, at the beginning, the content of the controversy was the practicality of vape. When vape became popular, the focus of vape controversy gradually became e- As for the safety of cigarettes, the side that supports vape believes that the harm of vape is reduced by 95%, while those who oppose vape party B believe that vape is more harmful. This kind of controversy will still exist in 2021, and even , The controversy has become more extreme.
According to the information obtained on the Internet, it is the British government that supports vape more authoritatively. The British government’s support for vape stems from an independent review report. In 2015, the Public Health Agency of England reported that vape is effective for users. In terms of health, it is 95% safer than ordinary tobacco and has helped tens of thousands of smokers quit smoking. When many countries banned vape, the United Kingdom insisted on supporting vape, but so far, the annual report still "supports" the efficacy of vape as a smoking cessation medicine. England’s latest public health report pointed out that because the British government continues to support the use of vape to reduce the harm of tobacco, at least 1.3 million people currently use vape to completely quit smoking.
Secondly, the support and advocacy of the British medical community. In the United Kingdom, vape is included in the sale of medicines. The Royal College of Physicians clearly told doctors to promote vape to people who want to quit smoking as widely as possible. The British Public Health Department's recommendation is that the risk of smoking vape only accounts for a small part of the risk of smoking. In 2018, the United Kingdom began to allow the sale of vapes in hospitals and provided vape lounges for patients to encourage smokers to switch from traditional tobacco to vape, and eventually quit smoking.
The typical objection to vape is India. In India, from production, manufacturing, import and export, transportation, sale to distribution, storage and advertising, all vape businesses are prohibited. India’s reason for banning vape is that vape will endanger the health of the people, especially the impact on the health of young people, and a decree will be issued to ban vape completely. Violators may face up to three years in prison and a fine of approximately US$7,000, which is approximately RMB 50,000.
The National Health Commission of China yesterday released the "China Smoking Hazards Health Report 2020". The latest addition to this report is about the health hazards of vape. The report stated that "there is sufficient evidence that vape is unsafe." The report also mentioned that vape samples will produce some harmful substances. I agree with this. After all, vape has a certain hazard. There is no dispute. But I hope that the National Health Commission can also consider the hazards of vape and cigarettes. Make a list and make a comparison so that everyone can choose the lesser of the two evils, or choose to quit smoking.
I remain skeptical about some research reports submitted by countries that ban vapes. First of all, vapes in the industry basically agree that vapes with digestive system diseases are not suitable for use. vape companies believe that vapes are not suitable for smoking vapes. -Cigarette can aggravate digestive system diseases, and I just happened to suffer from stomach ulcers myself. I didn’t know much about vape when I first came to work at the company, and I like to play vape (after all, it’s free). After time, my gastric ulcer disease got worse, and the acid reflux was very severe all day long. After going to the hospital to take medicine, but the symptoms kept coming back and forth. When I told my colleague about the situation, my colleague gave me the e-liquid instructions. Look, one of the contraindications in the e-liquid manual is surprisingly digestive system disease. Later, after I stopped smoking vape, my stomach disease symptoms gradually disappeared. And every so-called research institution that opposes vape has not mentioned this issue. Is it because the research is not thorough enough or has it not really been studied at all? Second, when groups or organizations that oppose vape mention the hazards of vape, they usually avoid the hazard of cigarettes. As a substitute for cigarettes, vape is a substitute for cigarettes. A comparison of hazards is obviously unscientific and one-sided.
The vape industry has never denied that vape has a certain degree of harm, but I believe that the harm of vape is lower than that of traditional cigarettes. The harm of traditional cigarettes is already a consensus, but the harm of vape is very controversial. Why? Obviously, the research on the hazards of vape is not thorough enough, and even affected by certain aspects. I hope that in the near future, everyone can reach a consensus on the hazards of vape and give vape a real authority. In conclusion, if you still want to buy or not buy at that time, there will be no controversy if you can't help it.
Prev:It's time to stop selling vape online
Next:vape is again related to drugs
