The electronic cigarette industry needs its own perfection
Views: 450 Update date: Mar 22,2019
In 2019, capital entered the vape industry for the most year, which made the relatively quiet vape industry quickly become more and more lively. However, after the 351th party, the vape industry was pushed to the forefront. The vape products on the platform of the two e-commerce platforms of Jingdong and Suning were re-launched, but it can be seen that the 315 has brought the vape industry. The impact.
Controversial vape, an "alternative" originally designed to quit smoking, but vapes, but it seems that "smoking cessation" is not the main selling point of its propaganda. The controversy about this industry has never stopped:
Supporters cited a statement issued by the British Ministry of Health: vapes reduce damage by 95% compared to cigarettes; while the counter-counter quotes cases of vapes banned in many countries, so it is concluded that the harm is not necessary to have fewer cigarettes; With the growing number of vapes, the voice of controversy is growing.
Many people blame it because they have moved the traditional tobacco cake, and the e-smoke business’s unclear propaganda is not the murderer of the vape. Behind its chaos, it is due to the lack of selection criteria, the lack of market supervision, and the serious misleading of bad merchants to consumers. Many vape brand leaders believe that vape chaos has become a "tumor" that disrupts the order of the industry, and there is no need to clean up and rectify it.
In the United States and many Asian countries, vapes are classified as "tobacco products" and are regulated by the Tobacco Bureau. In Europe, Japan, and Taiwan, vapes are classified as "medicine products".
The detail that deserves attention is that the United Kingdom and France are similar to the European Union in terms of vape efficacy, and they also adopt a classification control strategy to treat products that meet the definition of drugs or medical devices as pharmaceutical products (the rest are regarded as tobacco products).
In France, for example, when vapes and e liquid are used for smoking cessation purposes, they are considered as pharmaceutical products regardless of the content of Nico and the concentration, but if it is not for smoking cessation, the content of nie is ≥10mg or the concentration is ≥20mg/ml. You need to apply for a medical license.
Domestic technology companies have set off the banner of vapes, and vape entry barriers are far lower than "tobacco products" and "medical products." The country has not come forward to "preside the fair", and the plain text stipulates that tobacco is in charge? Is the medical department or the health department setting standards? The Chinese vape, which has been delayed by the policy, is like a golden triangle that lacks supervision.
At present, I get information from e liquid manufacturers, nicotine is completely out of stock, we must know that the nicotine salt, an important component of e liquid, is extracted from nicotine, and the nicotine on the market has never been lacking. Suddenly out of stock is very embarrassing, and there may be hidden invisible behind it. The hand is intervening.
Only when the dispute is resolved first, can the industry take on greater responsibility. The vapes that were named after vape exposure at the 315th party are warning consumers. We call on everyone in the vape industry to attach great importance to it, actively fulfill their social responsibilities, and provide consumers with reassuring cigarettes and smoking cessation products with strict standards. The government will formulate e-tobacco industry regulatory laws and regulations as soon as possible, and strictly regulate industry product standards. At the same time, care for adolescent health, and never sell vape products to minors. Only in this way can the vape industry develop further and grow stronger.